We
previously pointed out
how some crude, absurd gender stereotypes are in fact proven true by
science. But, in the interest of not letting 60s sitcoms have the last
word on the differences between men and women, we should point out how
many things "everyone knows" about women just plain aren't true,
according to science. Like...
#6.
Women Aren't As Aggressive
Remember that nursery rhyme about what little girls and little boys
are made of? Boys are made of errant amphibians, mollusks and puppy
parts while girls are made of sugar and spice and all that's nice. It'd
be an adorable if it didn't also sum up gender expectations for the rest
of your life.
Snails and dog tails make you more aggressive.
When we grow up, women are more likely to be
penalized for displaying too much aggression, while men are rewarded for the exact same behavior.
Sometimes with millions of dollars.
When actually ...
Women might be the more aggressive of the genders.
Researchers found that when you
deindividuate
a person--or place the person in a situation where he or she doesn't
have an individual identity--aggressive attitudes are amplified. This
makes sense. It's probably why Marines are required to wear the same
uniform, and
hipsters
are such pussies. Well, they tested this in the lab by having men and
women play an interactive video game that required killing other players
by dropping bombs on them.
They found that under normal circumstances, men dropped far more
bombs than women. But in the deindividuated groups, women out-attacked
the men every time, with an average of about five more bombs dropped per
session.
Might as well face it, you're addicted to MASS MURDER.
Putting people, particularly women, in a situation where they are
anonymous and don't have to conform to societal expectations is very
powerful psychologically. And by very powerful, we mean it turns them
into an unfeeling murder machines.
#5.
Women Aren't as Horny as Men
When it comes to the topic of sex drive, everyone knows the
stereotypes: Men are shameless swine who will nail anything with a
pulse, and women are only interested in lovemaking that satisfies them
on an emotional level.
Think back on your adolescence, and it seems self-evident, doesn't
it? Boys are so sex-driven that they literally have to hide their
protruding penises (penii?) with baggy jeans and Trapper Keepers. Girls
rarely have that problem. And as adults, we all know that it's mostly
men, not women, populating the porn-viewing public. The Kinsey Institute
even says so. Obviously, men are much more interested in sex. Case closed.
When actually ...
Women are probably just as horny as men--they just don't want you to know it.
The "fan and demure smile" look is just a more elegant "hard-on poking through the jeans."
A recent study
asked a large group of test subjects about their sexual behavior but
put some clever controls in place. One group of respondents gave their
answers while connected to a polygraph machine, and a second group was
put in a with a researcher and told that their answers would be
monitored. A control group was told their answers would remain
completely anonymous.
It turns out that when women were faced with the chance of someone
seeing
their answers (the group with the researcher in the room) they all
suddenly became contestants in a Miss Chastity pageant, reporting only
half the number of sexual partners that the group connected to the lie
detector claimed. But the women connected to the polygraph actually
reported
more sexual partners than the men in the same control group.
"Well, there's the weekly foursome, the monthly "Lezz-In" and the occasional anonymous stall sex."
Experts interpreted this as women feeling "pressure to adhere to sex
role expectations that indicate (they) should be more
relationship-oriented and should avoid being seen as promiscuous." Just
like with the bombing experiment, take away what society expects of us,
and our true colors show.
Most of those colors are shades of pink.
On a related note...
The pimps who make up the advertising world have known for decades
that the best way to catch a man's eye (and money) is with copious
amounts of T&A. Men will line up to buy a large-caliber gunshot to
the face as long as there's a scantily clad woman in a submissive pose
somewhere telling them how awesome it's going to be.
But what about women? It's been widely believed that the fairer sex
isn't affected by erotic imagery to the same degree that men are. And
not just in advertising, but in movies, magazines or any other forms in
which it might appear. Which is why you don't see half-naked beefcake
flanking bottles of hair conditioner.
When actually ...
According to this study, women's brains react just as quickly to erotic images as men's do--and in fact the reaction may even be stronger.
They even use different "circuits" to process them as opposed to the
pathways that are reserved for everyday images. Using EEG electrodes to
monitor brain activity, researchers showed a group of female subjects
pictures that ranged from pleasant to disturbing. Everything was cool
until they got to photos that showed couples engaged in sensual poses.
Erotic images elicited neurons to fire at 160 milliseconds, which was
20 percent faster than even the quickest reactions to the non-erotic
pictures--even if those pictures depicted immediate danger, like a
snarling animal.
Above: less interesting than a penis.
If you've heard that stuff about how erotica turns women on only if
there's some kind of deep backstory or emotional connection to what's
going on, keep this in mind: 160 milliseconds means the women's brains
were lighting up in response to the naked people
well before they even consciously registered what they were seeing.
Way before the thinking part of their brains could warm up, they
already had an immediate, knee-jerk animal response that screamed,
"LOOK! A BONER!"
#3.
Only Women Suffer from Media-Perpetuated Body Issues
Women have been complaining forever about the impossibility of living
up to the female body image that is presented in media. There are like
eight billion periodicals marketed to women, and every one of them has
some thin teenager with perfect teeth, huge
boobs and no blemishes staring out from the cover--not just
Martha Stewart Living. It's no wonder the grocery store checkout line is known as the "boner chute."
This colloquialism was submitted by Gertrude Weinbauer, Food Lion #1557.
Complaints and checkout erections aside, it's not
our fault
the media is presenting this airbrushed picture of what women should
look like, or that real-world women are buying into it. If you ladies
don't have the sense to know that it's all a sham, then maybe you
deserve your crippling body image diseases.
When actually ...
Men are starting
to feel the exact same pressures to look perfect.
A recent study commissioned by Harvard found that a full 25 percent of people with eating disorders like bulimia and anorexia are men.
Look at that asshole, just brushing his teeth all the live-long day. How can a real man compete with that?
The effect that these media portrayals have is real
and the body image problem has jumped the gender barrier, so stick that
in your overly tanned, sharply chiseled faces, men. Surveys show that a
growing percentage of dudes believe that the only attractive male
physique is an extremely muscular one, and they are going to great
lengths to attain it.
Typically, that means consuming large amounts of protein, obsessing
about their weight and working out so much it interferes with other
parts of their lives. It doesn't even matter that in the media, the
dudes who have chiseled bodies tend to be douchebags.
They were right! We were just jealous this whole time!
#2.
Women Aren't as Good at Math
This stereotype isn't as in-your-face as the others on the list, but
it's there. If you look around at the people who hold most of the
science, technology and engineering jobs in the world today, you'll
quickly be tempted to ask, "Hey, where are all the chicks?" Anyone who's
ever spent time around a college math lab, a corporate IT department or
an engineering firm will notice a preponderance of dudes with skinny
arms, ironic T-shirts and
Tron collectibles.
And very few women.
This shortage of women in science and technology fields has given
birth to the idea that maybe women just aren't as talented or as
interested in those areas as men. Or more specifically, that they aren't
as good at math, which is kind of the underpinning of the whole
shebang. If you're not good at math, you're going to make a crappy
scientist, right? And if women aren't well represented in the sciences,
doesn't it follow that they're just not as skilled at mathematics?
When actually ...
Janet Hyde from the University of Wisconsin-Madison
compiled math test scores and SAT results from more than seven million students,
and found absolutely no difference in scores between males and females.
So if girls have a mathematical aptitude equal to that of their
testicled counterparts at the end of high school, why aren't they moving
forward into scientific careers in greater numbers?
Why the hell not?
Well, the answer is nobody really knows. But right now, most
researchers are leaning toward causes with social and environmental
origins.
One recent study
found that teachers in grade school can impart their own anxieties
about math to their female students, engendering a belief that boys will
always be better at math than girls.
Another potential environmental explanation
is social identity threat.
This is a phenomenon in which knowledge of a stereotype actually makes
you fail--thereby validating the stereotype. It's like a Catch-22, but
with breasts. In either case, the next time you're trying to impress
some girl with your knowledge of isotopes and quadratic equations, just
remember that there's an even chance that she's actually better at that
shit than you are. Calculate
that, Poindexter.
#1.
Most Victims of Domestic Violence Are Women
Making jokes about domestic violence is about as awesome as making
jokes about genocide. So we'll skip the hilarity and go straight to the
stereotype about spouse abuse: If you're talking about one person
beating up another in the home, you're probably talking about the man
beating up the woman. That's why everyone believes
that bullshit statistic about spousal abuse skyrocketing on Super Bowl Sunday.
Men are bigger, women are weaker. Men are more aggressive, more
violent, more prone to jealousy, and women are their usual victims.
When actually ...
Women are
more likely to abuse, stalk and attack their partners than men are.
And there are literally
hundreds of scientific studies
with sample sizes in the thousands to back up this assertion. In the
world of gender research, domestic violence is a subject that has been
studied over and over again. The evidence is clear: When couples resort
to physical violence, more often than not it's the woman who attacks the
man first.
Hey Internet, what's the name for this fetish?
Consider this write-up from a study by Straus and Ramirez: "When only
one partner was violent it was twice as likely to be the female than
the male. Moreover, in terms of severe aggression females were twice as
likely to be violent than men." Holy shit, ladies. Time to chill the
fuck out.
If you're wondering why you've never heard these stats before,
there's the obvious fact that men are bigger and therefore more likely
to hurt women, and deserve to get raped in prison. But it's probably
also because men are less likely to report physical attacks to the authorities than women are. And for some reason, men are really
really less likely to report having a foot broken off in their ass by a 110-pound woman.
"It was a Hitler. No, three Hitlers."
It's the same old story: The stereotype persists because we're
ashamed that we don't conform to it. Whew, that's depressing. How about
before we end the article and we all go crazy in the comments, we join
together and look at this adorable little kitty who broke his little
leg:
Awwww...